It means the speaker doesn't have a proper appreciation of Jane Austen. (There's a nice bit in a Sarah Caudwell novel in which two women have been invited to what they don't realize is a sex party, with large amounts of alcohol and marijuana in the mix, by someone who doesn't realize they aren't a couple. One of them, having gotten somewhat stoned, sits happily in the corner reading a Jane Austen book, and complains afterward that some people are not sufficiently tolerant of others' pleasures: she wasn't urging him to put his clothes on and read Austen, but he kept urging her to take hers off and have sex with someone.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 02:54 am (UTC)Edit: try *both* to find out, rather.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 02:59 am (UTC)Or, possibly, that they have had more contact with wallpaper paste than I care to imagine. With Top Gear? It's tough to tell.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:54 am (UTC)bland and over-hyped?
beats me...
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 04:04 am (UTC)It's Austen, by the way.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 06:18 am (UTC)Also, it sounds like that writer doesn't like Jane Austen.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 07:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 11:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 12:49 pm (UTC)If you're interested, I recommend Boudreaux's Butt Paste (http://www.buttpaste.com/BLButtPaste.php).