Peeve

Feb. 17th, 2004 01:00 am
jbsegal: (Default)
[personal profile] jbsegal
I hate the use of blatantly out-of-period music in period drama movies.

I'm fine with re-setting period things (G&S, Shakespeare) to different periods and using appropriate music with them, but techno/electronica in a 1910's period piece really really bugs me.


This isn't even the start of why I loathe Moulin Rouge, though.

Date: 2004-02-17 09:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dr-memory.livejournal.com
If you disliked Moulin Rouge, Gangs of New York would probably kill you.

Luckily, I can recommend with a clear conscience that you skip it, as it basically sucked.

Re:

Date: 2004-02-17 09:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] justinjs.livejournal.com
Agreed... except for Daniel Day-Lewis. I thought that he was fabulous in an otherwise skippable movie.

Date: 2004-02-17 09:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gravitrue.livejournal.com
So how do you feel about out of period errors
made by G&S and Shakespeare?

Re:

Date: 2004-02-17 11:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jbsegal.livejournal.com
A brief - or even an extended - anachronism in the script of a piece doesn't bother me...it integrates into the whole much better than out-of-style music does.

Good soundtracks enhance and I just don't think what I'm talking about enhances - it just breaks the mood, repetedly.

Date: 2004-02-17 12:16 pm (UTC)
totient: (Default)
From: [personal profile] totient
Ah. The secret is, Moulin Rouge is not a period drama, it's a contemporary comedy. I still didn't like it very much, though.

Date: 2004-02-18 06:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-nita.livejournal.com
Okay - what started this rant, hon? MR?

Can I ask an art question? If putting them into different period clothing, local & the like, why is putting the music different bad?

Re:

Date: 2004-02-18 07:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jbsegal.livejournal.com
What started this (this time) was "Iron Jawed Angels", as mentioned in the Now Playing ("Music"?) field of this entry.

http://www.hbo.com/films/ironjawedangels/?ntrack_para1=leftnav_category5_show0

It's the story of the Suffrage movement in the US, 1915-1917 or so.

To quote from an IMDB review:

Ron Smolin (rsmolin@ix.netcom.com)
Philadelphia

Date: 17 February 2004
Summary: Excellent Story, Terrible Music

This docu-drama provides a wonderful story of the right-to-vote movement early last century, but whoever selected the anachronistic music soundtrack has to be taken out and shot. The idea is to show what it was like in 1900-1920 period, and the production shots and camera work do a fine job; but why in the world do we need rock'n'roll music to offer a major distraction to the film? This really made watching the movie at times repugnant. And the director and editor decided to do some fancy, techno editing effects, which further removed the film from the proper time setting. But the fine acting by all major players, and the great story itself, save this film.
= = =

and someone else said, in part:

"Think of a great movie like Richard III, a retelling of the Shakespeare play set not in late 15th Cenury England but in the 1930s during the rise of Nazism. The film embraced the anachronism and used it to telling effect. Iron Jawed Angels, by contrast, is littered with false moments and sounds that distract rather than reinforce the story."
From: [identity profile] nosebeepbear.livejournal.com
As if the rest wasn't bad enough, the main character dying of TB in the middle of her big number irked me more than I can possibly tell you.

Re:

Date: 2004-02-18 10:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-nita.livejournal.com
Fair enough - I'm not familiar with the movie.

Just checking if it was a scenario specific problem, or the whole "taking things out of time period" thing in toto.

Profile

jbsegal: (Default)
jbsegal

April 2025

M T W T F S S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags

Page generated Dec. 29th, 2025 06:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios