The first thing that occurs to me is that one reason for a unanimous decision COULD be that it is politically/personally expedient for each of the justices that the decision be rapid and unanimous.
Yeah... I know.
It isn't that I assume the worst- merely that I remain painfully aware of the possibility...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-01-11 12:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-11 12:39 pm (UTC)When all of the SCotUS can agree, I'm willing to say "that's the way the law is" and not try to second guess them.
In this case, it was a money laundering conspiracy case, but that doesn't matter, really.
I'm a cynic...
Date: 2005-01-11 01:33 pm (UTC)Yeah... I know.
It isn't that I assume the worst- merely that I remain painfully aware of the possibility...
no subject
Date: 2005-01-11 01:38 pm (UTC)