(no subject)

[jbsegal]

Given this:
A new series year designation will result from a change in the Secretary of the Treasury; the Treasurer of the United States; and/or a significant change to the note's appearance such as a new currency design.
(http://www.moneyfactory.gov/uscurrency/smalldenominations.html)

Shouldn't these 2 bills be 2 different series??

Comments

[deguspice.livejournal.com]

Could it be that both bills came out in 2006?

[jbsegal.livejournal.com]

In which case I believe the 2nd should be 2006A?

[the-nita.livejournal.com]

Or they don't consider it to be a significant change?

[nakor.livejournal.com]

One's counterfeit. The real 2006As say so.

[(Anonymous)]

That same page has a pdf listing series and prefix info and doesn't list a series 2006a at all, just 2 series 2000s. That was my first thought, but it doesn't seem to be the case.

[jbsegal.livejournal.com]

Oops. That was me.

[the-nita.livejournal.com]

Forgive me - I'm not American and don't handle the currency enough to keep on top of what the markers for counterfeit currency are,.

[whitebird.livejournal.com]

They are two series.

The first series is Ugly.

The second is Butt Ugly.